1) What is the author's understanding of convergence
culture?
Henry Jenkins refers to convergence culture as one “where
old and new media collide, where grassroots and corporate media intersect,
where the power of the media producer and the power of the media consumer
interact in unpredictable ways.” In this sense, traditional media platforms
such as radio, television, newspapers, and other platforms merge into one
another through the advanced technology of the twenty-first century. Sources of
information are no longer related to distinct outlets but rather, where you
happened to come across them. Corporations no longer dominate the chain of
information flow as technology has provided mediums that place grassroots
organizations on par with corporations in regard to volume of production and
circulation. No longer is one party dictating to another but rather, a two-way
street has been opened in which dialogue now occurs and creates all new
dimensions to media production and consumption.
2) What is creative engagement?
Creative engagement is the not just the use of creativity by
an individual but with the intent to creatively engage with their community,
whether it be local or global. In a time of such immense change, creativity is
one of the most valuable assets humans possess. New modes of thinking, new
modes of doing, and new structures of relationships force individuals of the
twenty-first century to constantly push the envelope and above all, avoid
stagnation. Progress and change are fueled by the creative potential of
humanity and the technological tools at our fingertips are not meant just to be
absorbed but to be utilized to an extent each individual is uniquely capable
of. With technology and the age of the Internet, creativity doesn’t just happen
in somebody’s basement or garage out of the world’s view but rather is
increasingly visible to the world, as feedback is instantaneous and progress
more possible than ever. The key is creating in an interconnected world and
never allowing the comment “This is enough” to stick.
3) How are the participators engaging?
Participators are engaging in the world of convergence by
restructuring the power dynamics of information exchange. Companies can no
longer hide behind legal proceedings and back door dealings, as the world now
has eyes in all places. The interconnected world is completely dependent on a participatory
culture. The Internet is an infrastructure that must be continually
perpetuated, added to, edited, and propagated by the users of the world. Whether
it be someone’s novel, their work in Photoshop, their blog on their opinions,
viral sharing, video creation, and the list goes on, the key is engagement. No
longer is passive absorbency of the world around us acceptable but rather, we
must actively engage in contributing to progress and the well-being of humanity
as a whole, rather than the traditional fractionalization of society. The Internet
has created a global community in which anyone can contribute as long as they
are willing to participate.
I liked how you mentioned that companies have eyes on them at all times. I think this is both good and bad. Like you mentioned, back door dealings and unethical practices are now easier to see and stop. On the other hand one mistake can ruin a company's image and reputation over night with how fast information is spread over these new mediums. For example Chick-fil-A received a lot of negative feedback when the president said he didn't agree with gay marriage.
ReplyDeleteI agree with most of your points, but I struggling a bit on the sentence "companies can no longer hide." I agree that convergence and social media has made it more difficult for these companies to hide, but are they really completely transparent? Most company's social media sites are quick to point out how great the company is, but don't deal with insults very well. Of course there are exceptions to the rule.
ReplyDeleteI guess what I'm trying to see is that I think we are moving in a direction where its harder for companies to cover up corruption but it's not completely there yet.
Dylan,
ReplyDeleteThe way that you explained participators gaining power by being more informed on information that is presented by companies, gave me a different look on who is controlling who. I agree with your perspective that participators can regaining control of presented information.
Dylan,
ReplyDeleteI really liked how you mentioned "This is enough" as a dying trend. I too feel with all the emerging technologies that there is always something to be improved, another way to collaborate and make a project even better. Technology is allowing our generation after us have more creative abilities and control than any before us. Some people may say that millennial's are lazy, but we are able to work independently on different technologies and create our own wealth.